Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:

We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world’s users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.

This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

  • @shotgun_crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -8
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You should also remove the cached content, if possible. Also no idea about the downvotes… If you don’t like the decisions that an instance makes, go to another one. It’s that easy.

  • freddy
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Guess they deserved it because were too subtle in naming.

  • Ivyy@LW
    link
    fedilink
    142 years ago

    This is why Lemmy won’t grow, a lot of instances are forcing their users to create another account on other instances, this was my third account due to the blocking of some instances like this…

  • Bobby Bandwidth
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    I have an idea. How about all of the complainers go and start your own instance and allow whatever you want. When you have 100k users good luck sleeping.

  • @LakesLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Interesting the level of outrage. I guess if Lemmy’s userbase is heavily “Reddit users who were outraged enough to leave a private platform over entitlement towards free API access and come here” then it’s going to skew heavily “easily outraged”.

    I don’t see a huge issue really - the whole point of the fediverse is there are other instances to go to. Some of them will lean more towards covering their asses, some will pop up (and get c&d and taken down and repeat) for the illegal stuff. Some will tell bigots to go fuck themselves and outrage racists, "gender critical"s, etc about free speech (this instance literally says it’s not a free speech zone so what are you doing here?). Others will happily accommodate it. Pick your poison.

    Okay, downvote away, but when you get bored of clicking down arrows on everyone who doesn’t 100% agree with you and actually leave like you said you would, don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out. You’re more than welcome to take your toxicity elsewhere.

  • @A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I believe most users understand the difficulties and appreciate your work…
    Cheers !

  • @joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    218
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Uh, @lwadmin@lemmy.world … what’s up with the banning going on in this thread? I noticed on a.lemmy.org that someone was labeled “banned” and their comment was simply “Ight, I’m out”

    The mod note was “Let us help you”.

    There are more similarly weak (spiteful?) bans that certainly don’t seem to be at a standard for a ban. “Litterally 1984” was another one. Is that all it takes to be banned here?

    Edit: Many (all?) the users I referenced as banned are now unbanned from the site, but now banned from this community.

  • @RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    122 years ago

    This is a prime example of why I suspect we’ll see a lot more lemmy instances with a more narrow focus over time instead of just a few super lemmys. Its only keeping them indexed that will be a problem so that they can be found.

  • @BadAdvice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -122 years ago

    You guys shit the bed. Shiess the bed. Whatever you sourkraut fuckers want to call it. It would have been easier to set yourselves on fire in a bunker. Fascism is as fascism does. Tell us “it’s for the greater good”. You’re just cutting away the undesirables. You admins do so much for our own good and we should be grateful you know so much better than we do. That’s why you have all those updoots

  • kratoz29
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -92 years ago

    Ridiculous and lame movement.

    Those are discussing communities only, not even hosted at Lemmy.world, in case something goes bad it is going to be against them not this instance.

    Are you sure this is not a campaign to spread the load of the server?

  • @sneezymrmilo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -4
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Just for the record, thank you guys for doing this. I love lemmy world and appreciate you guys are taking precautions to make sure it sticks around. ❤

    Edit: Lol at people salty for me showing appreciation.

  • @nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    782 years ago

    I don’t understand why people are upset even a little about this. This is a prefect advert for the fediverse. If you are not completely happy with an instance(which can never realistically happen) then you just host your own or have multiple accounts. Apps have this built in and easily accessible. Why do people want to concentrate everything they want into one instance? What if that instance goes down? This should not be hated or applauded… just ignored as the way the fediverse should work. Don’t get too attached to any single instance.