Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced retaliatory tariffs after Donald Trump confirmed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods and 10% on energy, set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.

Trump justified the move by linking it to fentanyl smuggling concerns.

Trudeau called the tariffs “unjustified” and imposed 25% tariffs on $155 billion in U.S. goods, with $30 billion effective immediately and the rest in 21 days.

He warned of price hikes and job losses in the U.S., arguing the move violates Trump’s own trade agreement from his last term.

  • Lit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    should double those tariffs.

    • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      If Trump escalates, so do we.

      If we go “all in” on day one, we don’t have any future leverage.

      • Lit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        you are right, got to strategically tariff so it hurts US but with minimal impact on Canada.

        • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          got to strategically tariff so it hurts US but with minimal impact on Canada.

          Yup.

          That’s why the initial list of counter-tariffs were specifically chosen to hit the overlap of red states and things we make ourself, or can easily get elsewhere, or can comfortably do without for an extended period of time.

  • @wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    772 months ago

    We need to really turn the screws into the U.S. Along with applying tariffs, we also need to just outright stop delivery of critical materials they need. Full Stop.

    I’m know this is just a sounding board, but honestly I’d love to see the cutting off of any and all essential raw materials they need. I’m sure they can source it elsewhere, but they most likely can’t get enough of it fast enough.

    Cut off anything they need for energy and more importantly: agriculture.

    People can live without power. Make their stomachs ache.

    Trump is a diseased cunt who doesn’t understand what happens when things don’t go his own way. Let’s show him.

    • @puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Starting off slow and ramping up sends the correct message that (a) we want to find a way to stop this garbage and (b) we can and will make things more painful for business and consumers alike if it continues long term.

    • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      602 months ago

      The Beaverton had as a headline a few weeks back along the lines of “Americans choose the most expensive way to figure out what they purchase from Canada” which I thought was appropriate.

    • @BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      I said it before. Stop sending aluminum and steel and aerospace and military manufacturing would suffer immensely. That is 90%+ of all good made, metals have strict import requirements and certifications, and we couldn’t just make our own on a whim.

    • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Everytime Trump threatens tariffs they should out a one week export ban on literally everything to the US… That would really shock the system.

  • venotic
    link
    fedilink
    352 months ago

    By the end of these 4 years, everyone will be jobless and prices will be unreasonably high. Wonderful.

    • @Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 months ago

      4 years? Do people really think that there will be mid-term election? and presidential one in 4 years? really?

      • @samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Yes, elections are run by the states, not the federal government. Will red states have fair elections? Absolutely not.

      • Em Adespoton
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 months ago

        I thought the point of all this was to ratchet up tensions so Trump could declare martial law and suspend democracy indefinitely.

        “We have always been at war with everyone but Russia and China….”

  • @Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 months ago

    Carry on Prime Minister Trudeau and create better trade deals with the EU, EEC and friendly Asian countries.

  • @rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 months ago

    I was going to buy an item but the price went up since yesterday. Not going to buy it now. It’s his tax on us. Not going to finance Krasnov’s destruction of America.

    • bitwolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      Ditto. Our only hope is for brave nations like yours to smack our leaders down.

      My fear is that, the brain washed swarms will ignore the shortcomings and scapegoat something else.

  • @meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 months ago

    Trudeau’s measured retaliation shows Canada won’t back down but prioritizes diplomacy over chaos.

    🐱🐱🐱🐱

  • @apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1382 months ago

    Trump is such a vindictive moron. Whether he’s a Russian asset or just a certifiably stupid, the end result is the same.

    Good god I hate this fucking timeline. Fuck corporate America for backing this monster and fuck everyone who voted for him. Fuck the Democrats for collectively shrugging about all this too.

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 months ago

        Yeah, if he was just in it for his own aggrandisement, none of this would make sense. The orders are very clearly coming from Moscow here, because only Putin benefits from all this bullshit.

        • @samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          And he’s stupid for going along with it - a smart Russian asset US president would get something in return other than a pat on the head.

          • @itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            I mean presumably he’s getting a pile of money. Or there’s kompramat. Or, more likely, both. Also he just likes when people talk to him like he’s special, I’m sure it took the KGB all of 6 seconds to figure that out and take advantage of it

  • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 months ago

    Ok I’ve been wanting to ask this and all the articles don’t really address it so I’m confused.

    The whole rhetoric is that Trump’s tariffs will impact the citizens with increased prices and it’s really just going to cause economic harm. Like cool, I can understand that. But why is Canada then performing the same action effecting their citizens? I get it’s retaliatory, and suppose to expedite (hopefully) a return to normal trade policy. I just don’t get why this is the move when it’s a bad move in the first place (two wrongs don’t make a right and all). Please be gentle, I’m honestly just confused.

    • @Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      402 months ago

      Trump’s tariffs are universal. Meaning that even in cases where the only practical option is Canada, for example potash, they have to suffer a direct 25% price increase.

      The Canadian tariffs are highly selective, we only tariff goods that have alternate non US suppliers at similar prices. In this case the tariffs would mostly reduce market competition without directly affecting price.

      I think the better approach is to not enforced the digital lock aspects of the free trade agreement and have Canada be a leading repairer of farm and industrial equipment.

      • @cornshark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Doesn’t Belarus also produce potash? I thought they were dropping sanctions against them to get it

        • @healthetank@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I mean yeah, but Canada produces an ENORMOUS percentage of the world’s potash.

          Edit: checked the numbers. Canada produced ~38% of the worlds potash (25mil lbs), while Belarus produced 5-7mil lbs, most of which already goes to China, Russia, and India. Canada exports 46% of our potash to the US, meaning the US could buy ALL of belarus’ potash and still not meet current supply.

      • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Aluminum is another one, apparently. The element is everywhere, but it takes massive amounts of electricity to get in metal form, which we just happen to have from all the dams in great lakes region.

        Our Aluminum companies are literally planning to change nothing. They expect their American customers will just eat the cost.

    • @Spur4383@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 months ago

      If the tariffs are taylored correctly they can cause more pain in the US while minimizing cost to Canada. For example, us grain is not cheap and you can make it so that Canada buys from other countries at a similar cost. This will hurt farmers in the US (a key group for Trump) while not really hiring Canada.

    • djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 months ago

      There really aren’t any other moves to take. It’s either this or lie down.

      Also, I will say that tariffs can be a lot easier to manage if you only implement them against one of your trading partners. While major imports from that trading partner, and any goods produced with any of those imports, will see a price hike, most Western countries have very diversified economies and can make up the difference elsewhere. The real trouble begins when you start having blanket tariffs affecting all of your major trade partners, which seems to be Trump’s plan.

      • @healthetank@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        It’s still going to hurt - we import so much from the US that this is going to impact Canadians no matter what (even before price hikes in unrelated businesses starts).

        • djsoren19
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          It is going to hurt, and to my understanding it’s already begun impacting businesses. The only salve I can offer is that us Americans are going to hurt a whole lot more. Hopefully, Liberal is able to maintain power up there, and is working on new trade deals with new partners. Nothing the U.S. produces is really unique, so alternatives can be found, but it’s going to take time to set-up new agreements.

    • @Cenotaph@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 months ago

      My understanding is that when the americans institute their tariffs, all canadian products become more expensive for americans and not price competitive with local american products. This results in a decrease of purchasing from Canada.

      If we do nothing, then Canadians are still buying just as much american as before and there are little to no consequences for the tariffs

      With tariffs on both sides, the effect is roughly “equalized” in that we are both now buying more local goods and less trade over the border

    • @unused_user_name@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      Higher import taxes (tariffs) on Canadian goods for Americans will increase the price, presumably reducing the amount of these goods that Americans will buy which hurts the Canadian producers. The only thing Canada can really do is hurt American producers in the same way, hence increase tariffs to reduce Canadian consumption of American goods and hurt American producers just as much (or preferably more). Hurting each other is a loss-loss strategy though, which explains why trade wars typically do not have winners only losers…

  • @biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 months ago

    Today I watched both Trudeau and Sheinbaum’s addresses.

    I must say that Americans get even worse reputation everytime Trump and Vance talk even just because of the contrast with some of the best, most prepared speakers and I must say attractive individuals in politics today.

  • @Kimmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Excuse my ignorance but wouldn’t that make things more expensive for Canadians as well?

    :edit: thank you all for answering me. I totally understand now.

    Fuck trump

      • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe in Canada. In the US, I fully expect corporations to increase domestic prices by 15-20%, and still have the more attractive option for consumers. If and when the tariffs are dropped, it is unlikely that prices will go back down. Trump essentially just created a permanent new regressive tax, affecting the poorest of US citizens the worst.

        Anyone want to place a bet for what he blames it on? I’m hoping he goes for the classic Obama excuse.

    • ArchRecord
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Yes, tariffs increase prices in almost any case they’re implemented, which is the goal. Trudeau seems to be hoping that by adding these tariffs, it will become even easier to shift consumer behavior to buy non-American made goods, which could possibly either lead Trump to reduce/remove his tariffs, or at least make Americans feel more of the economic impact of those reductions in sales, which could then push more people to go against Trump politically.

    • @yes_this_time@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      Yes, but items are targeted to inflict the least amount of pain. We don’t neeed orange juice or bourbon for example.

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes. It’s alright, I’ve managed to mostly eliminate American products. Anyone smart or at least patriotic has looked into it as well, since the madness began. It was kind of neat watching the US products just sit on the shelves while Canadian stuff emptied out.

      To reiterate what all our politicians have been saying to US media, Trump is raising prices on Americans to hurt us, it’s for no good reason, and we’re forced to do the same on our side.

      • @Kaput@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There is a reason, is just like this old Western movies. The wealth banq/ranch owner that rules the town, is diverting the local stream to dry up the pretty widow a farm. Saying you know you would be much better off marrying me. I would cherish you and add you worthless farm to my ranch. Only he knows the train line is about to be installed and would turn that little plot of land into very valuable real estate. Ducking the widow in the as every night is just bonus.

      • @epicstove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Genuine question, if Trump’s tarrifs just make things expensive for Americans why would we put retaliatory tarrifs that effect us?

        Do tarrifs really just make things more expensive for the home country? How do they effect the country the tarrifs are imposed on?

        • @cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          Imagine widgets are $10 in country A, but a company in country B can make and sell them for $8. Buyers are likely to buy the cheapest (all else being equal). A 100% tariff would turn $8 into $16. Company B still only gets $8, but they now look far more expensive to customers in country A.

          They are designed to price out external competitors to local companies. This can be used to protect industries. Steel is a good example. China can make steel far cheaper than the rest of the world. However, steel plants take a long time to build and get producing. You generally don’t want a potential rival to have control of the materials you need for war production.

          Another legit use is to account for local regulations. If you require local companies to pay in a carbon credit system, an external company could undercut them from abroad. A tariff would help level the playing field.

          None of these apply to what trump is doing. He’s swinging a claymore mine around like a toy hammer. It causes huge damage to all involved.

        • @Honeybee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          Not an economic, but everything is entangled

          Say you have two products: one from USA ($110) and the same from Canada ($100). Now we impose a tariff of 25 pct on the Canadian product ($125).

          This means that consumers are going to buy the cheaper product, resulting in less income for the Canadian manufacturer.

          The USA manufacturer can increase the price to $120, and still be cheaper than their Canadian counterpart. All while prices for customers are increasing

          • @leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            The USA manufacturer can increase the price to $120, and still be cheaper than their Canadian counterpart.

            Unless there is no USA manufacturer, or there is but they don’t make nearly enough of the product to satisfy demand. More importantly, if the manufacturers we (USA) have buy much of the needed raw materials to make their products from Canada or other places with tariffs imposed, then a USA-made product becomes that much more expensive.

            It’s stupid, and hard on everyone but the blame is entirely on trump. Canada (and hopefully Mexico) imposing retaliatory tariffs is basically the only way to get trump to back down. Like with MAD (mutually assured destruction), the assured part has to be there or it doesn’t work. Even though it causes pain to everyone, retaliation is the most effective way to end this madness sooner–it will hurt the US economy, raise prices, and turn trump’s supporters against him. The more it hurts, the sooner people will be out in the streets.

            • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              turn trump’s supporters against him

              Other than this, I believe you are totally correct. After everything that’s happened in the past 13 years, what makes you think this will change anyone’s mind?

              A scapegoat(s) will be found, and Trump will make himself out to be the victim. As sure as the sun rises in the east, this will happen. I do not believe his cultists can ever be turned.

              • @leadore@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 months ago

                You may be right, it’s certainly been that way so far. It’s amazing how they never blame him for anything. But also, so far they’ve never experienced real negative consequences from his actions either, other than maybe a few small things they could easily dismiss as not related to trump (even if obvious to others). So we’ll see what happens when they and their friends and families start feeling some real pain. Obviously some still won’t be hurt much and some will never be able to admit trump screwed them no matter what, but others have already realized it and more of them will ‘find out’ as things keep getting worse for them.

        • Bryce
          link
          fedilink
          English
          252 months ago

          Trump’s tariffs make Canadian stuff more expensive for Americans, so they’ll tend to buy less Canadian stuff. Without retaliatory tariffs, Americans only buy American stuff, and Canadians continue to buy American stuff, so nobody is buying Canadian stuff. This hurts Canada because nobody is buying their stuff. With retaliatory tariffs, US stuff becomes more expensive in Canada, so it encourages Canadians to stop buying American and spend their money in Canada.

        • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Do tarrifs really just make things more expensive for the home country? How do they effect the country the tarrifs are imposed on?

          It makes it harder for that country to sell. Which means layoffs and loss of asset value there. The most dramatic example is the auto industry. They’re talking about just closing shop immediately, because their business plan depends on moving things back and forth across the border as they gradually get assembled.

          If this goes on as long as I suspect, there will be new businesses that bubble up to use the same resources, but it’s never going to be as nice as a single integrated continent, and in the meanwhile, time is money, things can’t grow and develop while just sitting there. Not to mention the workers that now don’t know how to put food on the table.

          Genuine question, if Trump’s tariffs just make things expensive for Americans why would we put retaliatory tariffs that effect us?

          That’s actually a separate question. It’s a matter of tit-for-tat, partly. But, there’s also the fact that the US government is pocketing all those tariffs. If we didn’t have a bit of extra income to match, I imagine it’d get really hard for the government to pay for things with our now weaker currency. Not retaliating was considered, though.

  • @kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    297
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I like Cory Doctorow’s plan.

    The reason Canada got tariff-free access to sell to the US in the first place? Canada agreed to enforce penalties for tampering with digital locks, following the premise of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act.

    If the US is going back on the deal, then Canada should too. Make it legal to jailbreak all US tech.

    Doctorow advocating for this plan:

    • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 months ago

      If the US is going back on the deal, then Canada should too. Make it legal to jailbreak all US tech.

      That should be considered with plans for further escalation varying from nothing to an embargo.

      Though arguably piracy and jailbreaking are not so bad for said domination. Microsoft practically encouraged piracy in ex-USSR at some point. Piracy solves the availability problem, supports market share, leads to short-term loss in sales but long-term growth.

      But that’s Microsoft, while US government in general seems to think DMCA is for them what the Sound was for the Danish crown in middle ages.

      • @boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Microsoft practically encouraged piracy in ex-USSR at some point. Piracy solves the availability problem, supports market share, leads to short-term loss in sales but long-term growth.

        Yup, Bill Gates pretty much said he’d rather have people growing up on pirated Microsoft products than use alternatives.

      • @kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        Yep, I caught that one too. He’s a fantastic orator. He’s got an endless arsenal of one-liners.

        I added a link to that and some other instances where he’s made this argument.

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        It already basically is; Anti-piracy laws in Canada don’t have a lot of teeth. I leave my torrent computer running 24 hours a day to seed and I don’t even get emails anymore after switching to a smaller service provider.

        • @samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          In that case, the Candian government should set up an official service for downloading American stuff. Making it easy to find things would be worth a nominal fee for a lot of people.

      • @lance20000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Yeah, I’m not too concerned about that. Their courts are being attacked with so much that I’m pretty sure downloading a car isn’t going to be high on their list.

      • @Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        A surprising amount of ‘American’ media is filmed and produced in Canada. Toronto Vancouver is like Hollywood North. This would probably be a footgun

    • AFK BRB Chocolate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      They could also make their own play store and apple store, and could charge the developers much lower fees, for the same apps that would work anywhere. It would cost them very little and be nothing but profit.

      • @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        The fact that both Apple and d Google fail to keep malware off their stores makes me think it’s maybe not so easy.

    • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      It’d be nice if somewhere, other than Russia and China, was doing the important reverse engineering work.